i
Call for papers Revista de Arquitectura N.º 47.
Ways of looking at architectural sustainability + FREE THEME
Deadline for receipt of articles: September 10, 2024
Guidelines for authors: https://dearquitectura.uchile.cl/index.php/RA/about/submissions
Co-creating an ecology of knowledge in the Caribbean: huerto de Capetillo
Authors
-
Omayra Rivera Crespo
Universidad de Puerto Rico
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6148-5537
-
Yazmin M. Crespo Claudio
Harvard University
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1636-7221
-
Natacha Quintero González
Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus - Senftenberg
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9650-8954
-
Irmaris Santiago Rodríguez
Universidad de Puerto Rico
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6784-6711
Abstract
Learning, restoring, and centering pedagogical approaches from the 'Global South' and specifically the Caribbean is imperative to foster emancipatory learning environments. With a history of exclusion, the last 60 years in Puerto Rico have witnessed a tradition of participation and activism, which despite its successes, has been largely invisible in the global design pedagogy. In this context, both popular knowledge and self-managed spaces are little recognized. This article seeks to make visible participatory action-research and co-creation methodologies from an ecology of knowledge (B. de Sousa Santos), situated in the community garden, nursery, and urban forest of Capetillo. It confirms that the Caribbean is a space where epistemological diversity and plurality of knowledge can be evidenced.
Keywords:
co-creation, ecology of knowledge, community garden, participatory pedagogiesReferences
Amescua Carrera, J., & Ordóñez Grajales, M. (14 de septiembre de 2022). Participation as pedagogy. Architectural Review. https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/participation-as-pedagogy
Bader, V. S., Lepik, A., & Technische Universität München (Eds.). (2020). Experience in Action! DesignBuild in der Architektur. Edition Detail.
Bakema, J. B. (1978). La comunidad de arquitectos Van den Broek/Bakema. Editorial Gustavo Gili.Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
Colón Rodríguez, Y. M., & Rodríguez, L. M. (2020). After the Storm: A Post-Critical Stance on Practice for Puerto Rico’s Reconstruction. En J. Y. Bean, S. Dickinson, & A. Ida (Eds.), Critical practices in architecture: The unexamined (pp. 143-173). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Cotto Morales, L. (17 de junio de 2016). La pedagogía urbana, un camino posible y necesario para las ciudades. 80Grados+ Prensa sin Prisa. https://www.80grados.net/la-pedagogia-urbana-un-camino-posible-y-necesario-para-las-ciudades/
Crespo Claudio, Y. M. (31 de agosto de 2022). Sobre el pasado, el presente y el futuro de la disciplina arquitectónica. Arquine. https://arquine.com/sobre-el-pasado-el-presente-y-el-futuro-de-la-disciplina-arquitectonica
Crespo Claudio, Y. M., Rivera Crespo, O., & Santiago Rodríguez, I. (2021). Performing Architectures: ‘haciendo teorías’ [making room] for situated narratives of design. En UIA RIO Proceedings, II (pp. 1075-1081). https://www.academia.edu/60965758/Performing_Architectures_haciendo_teor%C3%ADas_making_room_for_situated_narratives_of_design
Escobar, A. (2011). Una minga para el posdesarrollo. Signo y Pensamiento, 30(58), 278-284.
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Escobar, A. (2019). Autonomía y diseño: La realización de lo comunal. Editorial Universidad del Cauca.Farías, I. (2011). Ensamblajes urbanos: La TAR y el examen de la ciudad. Athenea digital, 15-40.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido. Tierra Nueva.
Galeano, E. (1998). Patas arriba: la escuela del mundo al revés. Siglo XXI.
Glissant, E. (1997). Poetics of Relation. University of Michigan Press.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Ingold, T. (2016). La creatividad que se experiencia. Investigación e Innovación en Arquitectura y Territorio, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.14198/i2.2016.5.13
Illich, I. (1975). La sociedad desescolarizada. Editorial Barral.
Latour, B. (2001). From “matters of facts” to “states of affairs”: Which protocol for the new collective experiments? Bruno Latour. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/372.html
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. OUP Oxford.
Lefebvre, H. (1992). The Production of Space. Wiley-Blackwell.
Lorne, C. (2017). Spatial agency and practicing architecture beyond buildings. Social & Cultural Geography, 18(2), 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1174282
Marks, L. U. (2018). Affective analysis. Routledge EBooks, 152-157. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714523-23Marres, N. (2012). Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday PublicsSpringer.
Merçon, J., Aguilar, M., Ángel, E., Armella, M. I. N., Núñez, I. I. F., Sánchez, A. A., & Méndez, E. D. G. (2012). Cultivando la educación agroecológica: El huerto colectivo urbano como espacio educativo. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 17(55), 1201-1224.
Molina-Guenante, M., Ríos-Peters, R. y Santi-Vargas, A. (2022). Pedagogía urbana como una herramienta de resistencia curricular: Aprendizaje para trascender la pandemia. Revista Saberes Educativos, 8, 8. https://sabereseducativos.uchile.cl/index.php/RSED/article/view/65847
Muntañola Thornberg, J. (2000). Topogénesis: fundamentos de una nueva arquitectura. Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya.
Noorani, T. & Brigstocke, J. (2018). More-than-HumanParticipatory Research. Connected Commun-ities Foundation Series. University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities Programme.
Ortiz, C., & Millán, G. (2022). CRITICAL URBAN PEDAGOGY: Convites as Sites of Southern Urbanism, Solidarity Construction and Urban Learning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 46(5), 822–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13119
Quintero González, N. (2020). Collaborative Knowledge Production for Planning under Uncertainty. En C. Kollert, & S. Weidner (Eds.), Städte erforschen und Räume gestalten – Forschung am Institut für Stadtplanung der BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg (pp. 204-213). BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-btu/frontdoor/index/index/docId/5235
Ramos-Gerena, C. E. (2023). Critical food policy literacy: Conceptualizing community municipal food policy engagement. The Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2023.122.008
Rivera Crespo, O. (2017). Taller de Diseño Colaborativo y Hábitat Evolutivo: puentes entre la academia y la comunidad. Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 1, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.15446/bitacora.v27n1.39917
Ryan, A., & Tilbury, D. (2014). Flexible Pedagogies: New Pedagogical Ideas. Flexible Pedagogies: Preparing for the Future Series. En Higher Education Academy (pp. 1-41)). Higher Education Academy.
Saeed, T. (2020). Reimagining education: student movements and the possibility of a Critical Pedagogy and Feminist Praxis (Paper commissioned for the UNESCO Futures of Education report). Unesco. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374157
Santiago-Ortiz, J. D. A. (2019). From Critical to Decolonizing Service-Learning: Limits and Possibilities to Social Justice-based Approaches to Community Service Learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0025.104
Santiago-Ortiz, A. (2020). Mapping Collaboration as Resistance to Neoliberalism: A Case Study of Participatory Action Research in Puerto Rico. Tracce Urbane. Rivista Italiana Transdisciplinare Di Studi Urbani, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562_4.8.17220
Santos, B. de S. (2010). Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Ediciones Trilce-Extensión Universitaria.
Santos, B. de S. (2019). El fin del imperio cognitivo: la afirmación de las epistemologías del Sur. Editorial Trotta.
Shillington, L. J. (2008). Being(s) in relation at home: socio-natures of patio ‘gardens’ in Managua, Nicaragua. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(7), 755-776. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802382560
Smithson, A., & Smithson, P. (1973). Without rhetoric; an architectural aesthetic, 1955-1972. Latimer New Dimensions.
Teyssot, G. (2011). Aldo van Eyck and the Rise of an Ethnographic Paradigm in the 1960s. Joelho, 2, 51. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8681_2_5
Tuck, E., & Wayne Yang, K. (2021). La descolonización no es una metáfora. Tabula Rasa (Bogotá, Colombia), 38(38), 61-111. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n38.04
Vasudevan, R., & Novoa, E. M. (2021). Pluriversal planning scholarship: Embracing multiplicity and situated knowledges in community-based approaches. Planning Theory, 21(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 14730952211000384
Wieck, K., Quintero González, N., Canedo, J., Petrus, F., & Karge, T. (2022). Common grounds across Brazil and Germany. Scape Magazine, 19, 124-129.
Instagram
Facebook