Send article
i

The Public Law Journal of the Universidad de Chile invites national and foreign authors to participate in the next issue of the Journal, corresponding to the second semester of 2024.

Articles must conform to the editorial guidelines, which can be found at: https://revistaderechopublico.uchile.cl/index.php/RDPU/about/submissions

The papers are subjected to a blind peer review process.

 

A critique of the weighting perspective

Authors

  • Francisco Javier Urbina Ayudante, Facultad de Derecho, P. Universidad Católica de Chile
No. 69 (2007): Tomo II
https://doi.org/10.5354/rdpu.v0i69.40025

Abstract

In modern positive systems it is not uncommon for what the doctrine has called "conflict of fundamental rights" to occur, that is, that in a specific case both parties can assert in their favor a certain fundamental right, whose acceptance by the court would necessarily bring about the postponement of that of the counterpart. In most cases, the problem will be that an action protected by a fundamental right damages another person's property which is also protected by a fundamental right, or harms the exercise of an action by another person, an exercise that is in turn protected by a fundamental right.

Keywords:

Ponderation, Conflict of fundamental rights, Fundamental rights

Downloads

Altmetrics
How to Cite
Urbina, F. J. (2016). A critique of the weighting perspective. Revista De Derecho Público, (69), Págs. 415–426. https://doi.org/10.5354/rdpu.v0i69.40025
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
 
Revista de Derecho Público
Facultad de Derecho
Universidad de Chile
DATOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN
Dirección de Servicios de Información y Bibliotecas (SISIB)