i
La Revista de Filosofía del Departamento de Filosofía de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades de la Universidad de Chile invita a la comunidad filosófica a enviar sus propuestas de artículos para el próximo número de la revista programada para junio de 2025.
Modalidad en mecánica cuántica
Autores/as
-
Bruno Borge
Universidad de Buenos Aires
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1755-9690
-
Olimpia Lombardi
Universidad de Buenos Aires
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2204-7902
Resumen
En este trabajo, proponemos un marco metafísico naturalista para una variante del posibilismo basada en una concepción bilocalizada de la modalidad. Luego de revisar problemas característicos de posiciones alternativas, exploramos la aplicación de este marco al caso de la interpretación modal-hamiltoniana de la mecánica cuántica. Finalmente, revisamos problemas previos a la luz de esta nueva propuesta.
Palabras clave:
modalidad, posibilismo, leyes de la naturaleza, interpretación modal-hamiltonianaReferencias
Adams, M. M. (1987). William Ockham. University of Notre Dame Press.
Ardenghi, J. S., Castagnino, M., y Lombardi, O. (2009). Quantum mechanics: modal interpretation and Galilean transformations. Foundations of Physics, 39, 1023-1045.
Ardenghi, J. S., Lombardi, O., y Narvaja, M. (2013). Modal interpretations and consecutive measurements. En V. Karakostas y D. Dieks (Eds.), EPSA 2011: Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science (pp. 207-217). Springer.
Armstrong, D. M. (1983). What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge UP.
Avicenna. (1926). Avicennae Metaphysics Compendium (N. Carame, Ed.). Pontifical Institute of Oriental Studies.
Bigaj, T. (2014). Quantum dispositions and the notion of measurement. Filozofia Nauki, 22, 5-24.
Bird, A. (2007). Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford UP.
Borge, B. (2015). The metaphysical status of Natural Laws: a critique of Stephen Mumford’s Nomological Antirealism. Filosofía Unisinos, 16(3), 256-269.
Borge, B. (2017) "Realismo Estructural Óntico y estructuras físicas". Manuscrito – Revista Internacional de Filosofía 40(2), 71-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2017.V40N2.BB
Borge, B., y López, C. (2023). Leyes y simetrías en metafísica de la ciencia. Revista Instante, 5(2), 69-99.
Borge, B. & Soto, C. (en prensa) Ensayos sobre realismo y estructuralismo científicos. Comares.
Brown, J. R. (2002). Smoke and mirrors: How science reflects reality. Routledge.
Busch, J. (2003). What structures could not be. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17, 211-225.
Carroll, J. (1994). Laws of nature. Cambridge UP.
Chen, E. K., y Goldstein, S. (2022). Governing without a fundamental direction of time: Minimal primitivism about laws of nature. En Y. Ben-Menahem (Ed.), Rethinking laws of nature (pp. 21-64). Springer.
Costa da, N., y Krause, D. (1999). Set-theoretical models for quantum systems. En M. L. Dalla Chiara, R. Giuntini, y F. Laudisa (Eds.), Language, Quantum, Music (pp. 171-181). Kluwer.
Costa da, N., y Lombardi, O. (2014). Quantum mechanics: ontology without individuals. Foundations of Physics, 44, 1246-1257.
Costa da, N., Lombardi, O., y Lastiri, M. (2013). A modal ontology of properties for quantum mechanics. Synthese, 190, 3671-3693.
Cresswell, M. (1973). Logics and Languages. Methuen.
de Harven, V. (2015). How nothing can be something: The stoic theory of void. Ancient Philosophy, 35, 405–429.
Denyer, N. (1998). Philoponus, Diodorus, and possibility. The Classical Quarterly, 48(1), 327-340.
Dretske, F. (1977). Laws of nature. Philosophy of science, 44(2), 248-268.
Elitzur, A., y Vaidman, L. (1993). Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements. Foundations of Physics, 23, 987-997.
Ellis, B. (2001). Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge University Press.
Fortin, S., Lombardi, O., y Martínez González, J. C. (2018). A new application of the modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics: the problem of optical isomerism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 62, 123-135.
French, S. (2014). The structure of the world: Metaphysics and representation. Oxford UP.
___. (2019). Identity and individuality in quantum theory. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition). https://plato. stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/qt-idind/
Hale, B. (1987). Abstract objects. Basil Blackwell.
Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and Philosophy. George Allen & Unwin.
Held, C. (2022). The Kochen-Specker theorem. En E. N. Zalta y U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/kochen-specker/
Hildebrand, T. (2023). Laws of Nature. Cambridge UP.
Holik, F., Jorge, J. P., Krause, D., y Lombardi, O. (2022). Quasi-set theory for a quantum ontology of properties. Synthese, 200, art. 401.
Kochen, S., y Specker, E. (1967). The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59-87.
Kneale, W., y Kneale, M. (1984). The Development of Logic. Oxford UP.
Krause, D. (1992). On a quasi-set theory. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 33, 402-411.
Kripke, S. A. (1959). A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24(1), 1-14.
___. (1972). Naming and Necessity. En D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of Natural Language (pp. 253-355; 763-769). Harvard University Press, 1980.
Lewis, D. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. B. Blackwell.
Lombardi, O., Castagnino, M., y Ardenghi, J. S. (2010). The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation and the Galilean covariance of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 93-103.
Lombardi, O., y Dieks, D. (2024). Modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. En E. N. Zalta y U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2024 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/qm-modal/
Lombardi, O., y Castagnino, M. (2008). A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39, 380-443.
Lombardi, O., Fortin, S., y Pasqualini, M. (2022). Possibility and time in quantum mechanics. Entropy, 24(2), 249.
Margenau, H. (1954). Advantages and disadvantages of various interpretations of the quantum theory. Physics Today, 7, 6-13.
Maudlin, T. (2007). The Metaphysics within Physics. Oxford UP.
Maxwell, N. (1988). Quantum propensiton theory: A testable resolution to the wave/particle dilemma. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 1-50.
Menzel, C. (2024). The Possibilism-Actualism Debate. En E. N. Zalta y U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/possibilism-actualism/
Molnar, G. 2003. Powers: A study in metaphysics. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Mumford, S. (2004). Laws in Nature. Routledge.
O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. (1995). The bundle theory of substance and the identity of indiscernibles. Analysis, 55, 191-196.
Parsons, T. (1980). Nonexistent Objects. Yale University Press.
Plantinga, A. (1974). The Nature of Necessity. Clarendon Press.
Popper, K. (1959). The propensity interpretation of probability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10(37), 25-42.
Psillos, S. (2006). The Structure, the Whole, Structure and Nothing But, the Structure? Philosophy of Science, 73, 560-570.
Quine, W. V. O. (1948). On What There Is. The Review of Metaphysics, 2(5), 21-38.
Rosen, G. (1990). Modal Fictionalism. Mind, 99(395), 327-354.
Schroeren, D. (2020). Symmetry fundamentalism: a case study from classical physics. Philosophical Quarterly, 71(2), 308-333
Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. MIT Press.
Suárez, M. (2004a). On quantum propensities: two arguments revisited. Erkenntnis, 61, 1-16.
___. (2004b). Quantum selections, propensities, and the problem of measurement. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, 219-255.
___. (2007). Quantum propensities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38, 418-438.
Tarski, A. (1941). On the calculus of relations. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 6, 73-89.
Tooley, M. (1977). The nature of laws. Canadian journal of Philosophy, 7(4), 667-698.
Tugby, M. (2016). Universals, laws, and governance. Philosophical Studies, 173(5), 1147-1163.
Vetter, B. (2009). Review of Bird. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 8, 320-328.
Wetzel, L. (2002). On Types and Words. Journal of Philosophical Research, 27, 237-263.
