Utrecht work engagement scale in Chile: measurement, reliability and validity
Abstract
Work engagement is described according to dedication, vigor and absorption. The most widely-used measure of work engagement is the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES). The purpose of this research was to study the psychometric properties of the abbreviated version of this scale (UWES-9) in the Chilean labor context. A cross-sectional survey design was used for a convenience sample (n = 255). The survey used the UWES-9 scale (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003), the psychological empowerment scale of Spreitzer (1995) and the generic job satisfaction scale (Macdonald & MacIntyre, 1997). The reliability index (alpha) was calculated, resulting in good internal consistency. The three dimensions of the scale were correlated to a large extent, so it was not necessary to eliminate determined items. With respect to construct validity, work engagement was correlated in the expected (positive) direction with psychological empowerment and job satisfaction. Managerial implications and challenges for future research are discussed.Keywords:
UWES-9, validation, work engagement, psychological empowerment, job satisfaction, ChileReferences
Bakker, A., Schaufeli W. & Leiter, M. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work and Stress Journal, Volume 22 (3), 187-200.
Bakker, A. & Leiter, M. (2010). Work engagement. A handbook of essential theory and research, Psychology press.
Bakker, A. & Leiter, M. (2016). Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46 (2), 67-75.
Bakker, A. (2017). Estudio engagement Chile 2017. Fundación Chile.
Boyd, B. K., Bergh, D. D., Ireland, R. D., & Ketchen, D. J. (2013). Constructs in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1): 3-14.
Britt, T. W., Adler, A. B., y Bartone, P. T. (2001). Deriving benefits from stressful events: The role of engagement in meaningful work and hardiness. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 53-63.
Chaudhary, R., Rangnekar, S. and Barua, M. (2011). Relation between human resource development climate and employee engagement: Results from India. Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 7(4): 664-685.
Conger, J. A., & Nord, W. R. (1990). Meanings of occupational Work: A collection of essays. Arthur P. Brief and Walter R. Nord (Eds.). Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
Demerouti E., Bakker, A.; Nachreiner, F. & Schaufeli, W.B. (2001). The job demands – resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, pp. 499–512.
DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Guidelines in scale development. Scale development: Theory and applications, (3rd ed.): 73-114. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fong, T., & Ng, S. (2011). Measuring engagement at work: Validation of the Chinese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. International Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 19, 391-397.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, (33), 4, pp.692-735.
Jose, G., & Rupert Mampilly, S. (2014). Psychological Empowerment as a Predictor of Employee Engagement: An Empirical Attestation. Global Business Review, 15(1) 93–104.
Juyumaya, J. E. (2018). Work engagement, satisfacción y rendimiento laboral: El rol de la cultura organizacional. Estudios de Administración, 25 (1), 32-49.
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of Job Satisfaction. In M.D. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Chicago JL: Rand Mc Nally.
Macdonald, S., & MacIntyre, P. (1997). The generic job satisfaction scale: Scale development and its correlates. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 13, 1–16.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. & Leiter, M. (2001). Job Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. (2008). Early Predictors of Job Burnout and Engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93 (3), 498-512.
Meyerson, S. y Kline, T. (2008). Psychological and environmental empowerment: antecedents and Consequences. Leadership & Organization Developmental Journal, 29(5), 444–460.
Moura, D., Orgambídez-Ramos, A., & Neves de Jesús, S. (2015). Psychological}Empowerment and Work engagement as Predictors of Work Satisfaction: a sample of hotel employees. Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, Volume III, Issue 2.
Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Dimensionality. Scaling procedures: Issues and applications, 18-40. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.
Panthee, B., Shimazu, A., & Kawakami, N. (2014). Validation of Nepalese version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Journal of Occupational Health, 56, 421-429.
Pérez, M.J., Labiano, M., & Brusasca, C. (2010). Escala de Deseabilidad Social: Análisis psicométrico en muestra argentina. Evaluar, 10 (2010), 53 – 67.
Rodríguez, R., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Peiró, J, & Grau, R. (2000). Desde el burnout al engagement: ¿Una nueva perspectiva? Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 16 (2), 117-134.
Saks, A. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
Salessi, S., & Omar, Al. (2016). Satisfacción Laboral Genérica. Propiedades psicométricas de una escala para medirla. Revista Alternativas en Psicología, 34 (Febrero-Julio).
Salanova, M., & Martínez, M. (2014). Organizational Justice, Work engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A winning Combination. Universitas Psychologica, 13(3), 961-974.
Seppala, P., Muano, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnumen, U., Tolvanen, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2009). The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10:459–481.
Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2003). Utrecht Work engagement Scale. Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University.
Schaufeli, W. & Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(2), 177-196.
Schaufeli, W., Martínez, I., Marques Pinto, A., Salanova, M. & Bakker, A. (2002). Burnout and Engagement in University Students. A Cross-National Study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5).
Schwab, D. P. (2005). On reliability. Research methods for organizational studies (2nd edition). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Work place: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 38 (5), 1442-1465.
Stander, M & Rothmann, S. (2010). Psychological empowerment, job insecurity and employee engagement. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36 (1).
Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346-357.
Thomas, K. W. & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
Tomás, José, de los Santos, S., Georgieva, S., Enrique, S., Fernández, I. (2018). Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(2) 89-93.
Wollard, K. & Shuck, B. (2011). Antecedents to Employee Engagement: A Structured Review of the Literature. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13 (4), 429-446.
